Archive for August 16, 2007

Be Still My Heart! A Genealogical Conference in the Heartland!

I have been to exactly one genealogical conference in my life. I really wasn’t sure that I had much to offer on the topic of genealogical conferences. Over the years, I’ve read what others have had to say about conferences. I especially agree with the oft-stated desire that conferences make their syllabi available on CD’s to save trees and make carrying easier. Based on the one conference I’ve been to and having reviewed potential conferences, I wish there could be more time or different scheduling so my favorite sessions didn’t overlap. And if one can’t travel for some reason or another, how about webcasts of major conferences?

On that last issue, as a lawyer, I’ve sometimes attended continuing legal education seminars that are nationally webcast. As for the social interaction aspect, various law schools around the country “host” (in the social sense, not the techie sense) the webcast as if they were actually hosting the seminar. So how about this: a national conference is webcast to local genealogical societies?! Seems like a potential win-win for all.

Last spring, I was quite excited by the possibility of attending the Conference in the States & Family History Fair of the National Genealogical Society. I’m a member of NGS. The Conference last year was held in Richmond, Virginia. The venue afforded opportunities to mark the 400th anniversary of the first colony in Virginia as well as the 225th anniversary of the Battle of Yorktown (which was the previous October).

The sessions and speakers at the NGS conference seemed very interesting and struck me as the most exciting conference lineup I had ever seen. But alas, I had already planned the Big Train Trip to Missouri, so time and finances conspired to keep me away from Richmond.

My perception has been that a lot of the big conferences are held on either Coast or in major cities. I understand the practical reasons for that. But how about a really major conference in mid-America?

Imagine my thrill when I signed into the NGS page not long ago and discovered that next year’s NGS Conference in the States & Family History Fair will be in Kansas City!

I’ve just been to Kansas City on my research trip this year, but I’m ready to go back next spring! Kansas City is a very affordable city and there’s a lot happening there. I can’t wait!

The clever parking garage across from the Kansas City (Mo.) Public Library

Centenarians

Yesterday, we reported here the death of Brooke Astor, the former Roberta Brooke Russell, at age 105. I noticed also yesterday that the world’s oldest person, 114 year-old Yone Minagawa, had died in Japan.

According to the Census Bureau, in the year 2000, the United States had 50,454 persons over the age of 100, out of a total population of 281,421,906. I couldn’t find a breakdown by gender, but we all have a pretty good idea who’s got the edge!

There are several centenarians on my family tree.

William Sanford was born in 1809 in Virginia and died at age 106 in 1916 in Rockdale, Milam County, Texas.

William Henry Long was born on March 21, 1889 and died on August 26, 1990, at age 101, in Kansas City, Missouri.

Christina Alta Long Neal, sister of William Henry Long, was born on April 2, 1898, and died on September 14, 2000, at age 102, in Kansas City, Missouri.

Tina and Will’s sister, Rosetta Bell Long, was nearly a centenarian. She was born on May 28, 1900 and died on March 17, 1994, at age 93, in Kansas City, Missouri.

More Credit: Denise Olson’s Family Matters

I’m still getting caught up with what’s been going on in the genea-blogosphere while I was travelling, so there may be some old news here over the next few days.

One of the neat things was that Family Tree magazine ran its list of 101 best websites. In the blogs category, Family Tree included Denise Olson’s Family Matters. An excellent call!

In Family Matters, Denise offers tech support tips. But Family Matters is part of a complex of blogs and sites colllectively entitled Moultrie Creek. It’s an interesting and esthetically attractive complex that’s fun to visit.

I know a bit about Denise’s “day job”–so I remain in awe of her prodigious abilities to keep her sites fresh.

Congratulations, Denise!

Once Again, "There Are No Easy Cases in Genealogy"

A key objective of the trip to Missouri had been to further identify Sarah Gilbert Johnson, the presumed wife of my great-great-grandfather Ezekiel Johnson. Unfortunately, I made no progress at all on this issue and it continues to frustrate me. I would have to say that this is my leading research objective right now.

So I had begun to write a post called “A Research Trip Failure,” this afternoon when, as these things will, something unforeseen occurred. To understand where I am now (since this afternoon) on Sarah Gilbert Johnson, we have retrace my steps on this relative’s history.

Perhaps 45 years ago, my mother told me that her grandmother’s mother was an Indian. My mother did not know her great-grandmother’s name or anything else about her. I didn’t really think any more about the matter for the next four decades. About four years ago, my mother’s sister, my Aunt Delorise Gines, published a family history calendar which identified our Indian forebear as “Sarah Gibson.” At that point, I took up my current interest in genealogy.

I searched for sometime for “Sarah Gibson” without success. Then one day, I came across the Clay County (Mo.) marriage records for 1867. There, “Ezekil” Johnson and Sarah Gilbert were listed as being married on September 5, 1867. I then focused on the surname Gilbert. I could not find a Sarah Gilbert who really matched the person I believed I was looking for. I came across Ezekiel Johnson’s death certificate and it listed Sarah Gilbert as his predeceased spouse. Gradually, over the years, I learned the names of some of Zeke and Sarah’s children. I acquired some of their death certificates which also listed Sarah Gilbert as their mother. I became comfortable with the surname “Gilbert.”

Nonetheless, I still could not find any individual information on Sarah Gilbert. I found a family in Clay County that conceivably could be her siblings, but the probative evidence was thin. Then, most recently, I found a family in Kansas that, again, conceivably, could be her parents. There are some reasonable theories and assumptions that support this idea, but again, the probative evidence is skimpy.

So my idea was that being on the ground in Missouri might be useful to this pursuit. For a number of reasons, it did not prove useful. Morosely, I began to write the story of my failure. Then I thought, let’s take one last shot at this. I began to go through the Missouri Death Certificate Index to examine every person who could be Sarah Gilbert Johnson and every person who could be one of her children.

I came across a death certificate for one Robert Franklin Johnson who died in Kansas City in May, 1955. This man had been born in 1893. I almost skipped over him because I had already (I thought) positively identified a Robert Johnson, born 1876, as the son of Zeke and Sarah. What brought me up short was the address on the death certificate: 2444 Chestnut Avenue. At various times, my grandmother, my great-aunts, my mother and some of her siblings all had lived in that block of Chestnut Avenue. I knew 2444 as the house of my great-aunt Rosie [Rosetta Bell Long,1898-1994].

Looking closer at the death certificate, I noted that Rose Long was listed as the informant. Aunt Rosie would surely know the right information. The father’s name was given as “Ezekell” Johnson and the mother’s name was given as . . . Sarah Agnes Lewis!

I immediately called Aunt Dee. She said she recalled that “Uncle Rob” had lived in Aunt Rosie’s house for awhile and had died there–about a week after her father had died. But she had never heard the name “Lewis” in our family tree.

With this strange turn of events, I went to work looking for plausible Lewises in the census records. And there, things got weirder! In the 1860 census for Wyandotte County, Kansas (the present-day Kansas City, Kansas), there is a 35 year-old Jane Lewis living with 22 year old Eliza Grezinger and 2 year old Sarah Lewis. Both Jane and Eliza are said to have been born in Ohio; Sarah is a native of Kansas. Then the shocker: both Eliza and Sarah are listed as Indians!

I can’t find this people anywhere else so far. We know that this Sarah is too young to be the wife of Zeke Johnson.

So am I onto something new or on another wild goose chase?

There are no easy cases . . . .

Getting Info from the Government: FOIA 101

Suppose your grandfather or great-grandfather worked for the federal government or for a government contractor, building Hoover Dam. Perhaps he kept a journal that stayed with the government for some reason when the project was completed. Or may be your relative was in the Far North as an early operator of the DEW Line. You might want to learn more about that than just what’s in the history books. Perhaps your family’s homestead was taken by the government to build a defense plant. Now you want to know what the place was like and to learn about the circumstances of the taking. Or, perhaps most interesting of all, maybe your ancestor was under surveillance by the FBI or passed information about his former homeland to the CIA. Wouldn’t that be something to know about?!

Information of the sort described above can be had from the government if you know the secret word that opens government vaults and and filing cabinets [with some exceptions] to ordinary citizens. And I’ll bet you do know the word, but maybe not how it works.

The “word” is “FOIA” (foy-yuh), the acronym for Freedom of Information Act.

Most people have heard of FOIA, but many do not know how it works or the type of information available under it. Many genealogists have used FOIA (even if they didn’t realize it) to get Social Security applications and passport information from the government.

Basically, FOIA requires federal agencies to make available to any person upon request records held by those agencies. A FOIA request should be in writing and must “reasonably describe” the records being sought. The request must be made in accordance with the particular agency’s rules and procedures which can be found on each agency’s website. The rules state such things as where to send the request and what the fees are (more about that later).

What types of information might be obtained under FOIA? “Agency records” include paper records, but also electronic records, photographs, sound recordings, maps, videos, etc.

There are exceptions to the obligation of a federal agency to disclose information. These include (1) national security information; (2) internal agency personnel rules; (3) information exempted by other laws; (4) trade secrets or confidential business information obtained by the government from another party; (5) internal documents exempt from disclosure in litigation; (6) personnel or medical files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy; (7) certain law enforcement information; (8) certain banking regulatory information; and (9) geological and geophysical information and data.

The exemptions can become quite complex and many have the subject of litigation before the Supreme Court. However, don’t let that stop you from making your genealogy-related request. The agency has to show that an exemption applies.

An agency may charge fees for FOIA requests. There are fee categories set out in the law. The most favorable fee categories are for educational institutions, non-commercial scientific organizations, and the news media. Generally, these entities must only pay the costs of duplication, but are entitled to the first 100 pages free. Other requesters generally may be required to pay the costs of search and review in addition to duplication.

There’s no obvious fee category that covers genealogists, but that may depend upon what you intend to do with the material. In any event, there’s a provision for a waiver of fees, no matter who the requester is. A waiver may granted if the material requested “is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.” As a genealogical requester, I would probably try to make this case.

An agency is supposed to make records “promptly available” after a request. Under the law, an agency has twenty days to determine if it will comply with the request. If it will comply, the agency must immediately notify the requester and then promptly make the records available. If the agency will not comply, it must notify the requester of a right to appeal–the appeal must be filed within 20 days of notification. The head of the agency then usually has ten days to decide the appeal.

In reality, most agencies have a backlog of FOIA requests and processing takes considerably longer than the deadlines. You have a right to go to court if the agency misses its deadlines, but I imagine that as genealogists, we’ve gotten used to waiting for public records.

Although the FOIA procedures can seem cumbersome, in most cases they are not. There are numerous FOIA websites that describe the procedures and give examples. I would advise, however, to check if the records you’re seeking are available without a FOIA request. For example, many records have been transferred to the National Archives and are available from them. Other records are now posted on agency websites.

FOIA applies only to federal agencies. Most states, however, have similar laws regarding disclosure of public records.

So if you want the map of the wildlife refuge that now occupies your grandmother’s homestead or a copy of the tape of your uncle’s interrogation by the FBI, use the magic word, FOIA.

The foregoing is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have a problem of a legal nature, seek legal counsel.

Kudos

Once again, in our Credit-where-Credit-is-Due Department:

1. Congratulations to Missouri, whose State Archives has now added images for the year 1935 to its Death Records project. This project is rapidly closing its gaps!

2. Thanks to the Local History Department of the Corpus Christi Public Libraries, which outdid its usual great service by responding to my request for a scanned copy of an obituary in an incredible twelve hours! I don’t imagine they can do that all the time, but I appreciated this week.

3. And since I’m up and about to an extent I really didn’t expect this soon, kudos to my doctors and the hospital staff for a job well done!

Light Schedule Next Few Days

I have to have some minor surgery tomorrow (Wednesday 8 Aug) and I may be out of commission for about two days, so our postings may be a bit light as we approach the weekend. Back to normal by Monday!

Interviewing Family Members in the Field

How many times have you heard somebody [or even yourself] say, “I wish I had asked [insert name of now-deceased family member here] about this!” That’s the family historian’s lament. It’s also sometimes the motivation to seek out far-flung family members to get their stories.

“Getting their stories” is the essential nature of what needs to be done. On the other hand, accuracy is just as important a value as “getting the story.” What’s the best way to accomplish both goals?

Uncle Fred is likely to be put off if you bring a court reporter or a bank of microphones connected to a large tape recorder and start by saying, “State your name for the record, please.” This approach will guarantee in most cases that you won’t get the story!

On the other hand, you may not get the story seated in Uncle Fred’s favorite dark bar, tossing back a few, and trying to write facts down on a cocktail napkin.

I think the “right” approach varies with the family member, although there are some basics that I like to use in every case.

First, I like to conduct the “interview” in a place comfortable for the family member, but where photos or documents may be easily accessible. That rules out the dark tavern! The family member’s home at a quiet and convenient time often works best.
Craig interviews his cousin Sylvia Jones (not pictured) in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 29, 2007. At left is Craig’s aunt, Delorise Gines, in whose kitchen they are seated. [Photo copyright Sherise Diamond. Used with permission].

Let your relative know in advance what questions you’re interested in, so they might think about the subjects and perhaps find documents and photographs that are related.

Ask your questions in a friendly, conversational manner. How do you record the answers, especially if some answers are long narratives? A lot of people are uncomfortable in the presence of a recording device and others get distracted by a listener who’s writing.

Assess in advance how your relative feels about recording devices. Sometimes this can be done simply by asking the relative; other times you may have to ask someone else or come to a conclusion based on what you know about the person.

I often take my laptop with me and before I get down to the actual “interview”, I show my relative some of the work that I’ve previously done. Sometimes I’ll show them a color chart of their ancestry as far as I know it, or sometimes I’ll show them a photograph of an ancestor. These techniques are friendly ways to get folks talking. Since they’ve seen me with the laptop, they’re not surprised when I type notes occasionally while they’re talking.

Many of the best “interviews” take place in very informal circumstances. In Kansas City, for example, I went to a family birthday party at a well-known seafood restaurant. I sat next to a family member with whom I had not spent much time on this trip. He was full of stories that I had not heard. Most of these were a little short on specific dates, but there was enough “meat” to follow up on the specifics later on.

Even an interview that commences informally can transition to a more formal interview at the right time. For example, while looking at a photograph that the family member has produced, the interviewer will want to record certain basic information–now may be the time to get out the digital voice recorder.

I also take my camera and portable scanner with me.

The key issue is to make the family member feel comfortable, respected, and trusting of the interviewer. This means that the family member must perceive that the interviewer is seriously interested and will not belittle or denigrate the family member.

What techniques do you use to “get the story” from family members?

Research Trip: The Don’t Overs

Sometimes when kids play games, they have rules that either allow or prohibit “do-overs,” that is, the opportunity to make the play again. In this post, we present the “don’t-overs” for genealogical research trips.

1. DON’T OVER-pack (Photo Grrl!): Remember, you’re not going to Mars. If you forget something, you can probably get it wherever you are. You don’t need a hundred changes of underwear or any other clothes. You can wash clothes just about wherever you are. Leave some room for things you might want to carry back. The airlines will charge an additional fee for overweight luggage. Amtrak won’t charge an additional fee, but will make you unpack and re-pack overweight luggage.

2. DON’T OVER-work yourself: Set reasonable goals with a reasonable schedule. Don’t schedule yourself with constant tasks from morning to night. Leave time for rest and relaxation and fun, and socializing with friends and family.

3. DON’T OVER-socialize: If you spend too much time socializing with friends and family, you’ll see your research time disappear rapidly

3. DON’T OVER-look your normal routine: Go to bed and get up at the usual times as much as possible. Have meals at your usual times.

4. DON’T OVER-analyze your evidence while still in the field. Analysis will possibly lead you to other resources in the field. But over-analyzing will take up time that could be better spent on information gathering.

5. DON’T OVER-collect information. Make sure that you are collecting valuable, relevant information and that you’re not just taking pictures, for example, for the sake of taking pictures.

6. DON’T OVER-plan: Be flexible and you’ll learn more and have more fun.

7. DON’T OVER-spend on tourist-y, faux historical items. Get the real things or don’t get them.

8. DON’T OVER-extend your travel: Know your limitations. If three days makes sense, just stay three days.

9. DON’T OVER-accept information just because it comes from “locals”.

10. DON’T OVER-impose your own culture and values where you’ve gone in a way that disrespects local traditions and customs.

We inadvertently violated several of these. We (Photo Grrl!) overpacked. We took far too many clothes and things we didn’t need. It was a hassle dragging around all the extra bags and at one point, we had to hold our breaths as one bag just barely made the Amtrak 50-lb. limit.

We weren’t clear with our friends and relatives about the fact that we needed some time when weren’t socializing to get some important research done. We kept saying “yes” to all the invitations that came our way. As a result, we lost track of our usual routines and meals came late and once in a while, we forgot to take medicine.

We probably tried to do too much. Fortunately, it worked out well in the end.

[On reflection, I'd add another one: DON'T OVER-do what seemed like a clever idea at first; you know, the "don't-over" as opposite of the "do-over." Oh, well!]

A Kansas City Follies Girl, c. 1920

She later was known as Florida C. Gines, my grandmother.

Coming Up: Research Trips–The “Don’t-Overs”