FamilyLink Mis-Cues Mar GW Debut; “H*ll” Breaks Loose at Site

I had written some fairly positive things about FamilyLink’s new social network, GenealogyWise, whose official debut is supposed to be today.  The company had a “soft” opening a week ago and within two days had garnered thousands of members with hundreds of specialty groups and discussions.  Many highly influential names in the genealogy world joined up.

It seemed as if FamilyLink CEO Paul Allen had found the right formula for a specialty social network.  The site is rich in content, some of it generated by FamilyLink, but most of it user-created.  There are none of the silly applications found on Facebook and the crowd for the most part appeared to be mature and well-mannered.  For most of the week, enthusiasm ran high about the site and expectations seemed to be met.  I, in fact had written a draft post to run yesterday that described GW after its first week as “one of the most advanced collaborative cyber-communities: a place where both individualistic and communitarian democracy can flourish.”  I said it “might be the ultimate  achievement in mass technolgical communications for special purposes.”

Not everybody was so effusive.  Cautionary sounds were made by Jasia, footnoteMaven, and Thomas MacEntee, who had been in the first cohort of travelers to GW.  Randy Seaver took a “wait-and-see” approach. These are all people I like and respect.

Then, the mis-steps began.  First, FamilyLink announced a “contest”  in which there would be $100 prizes for “the most”  blog posts, friends, group members, and other things.  This was a mistake for several reasons, not the least of which was that it mis-apprehended the nature and interests of the community.  No doubt it was intended to be celebratory; but it was off the mark.

Terry Thornton, the well-known writer from Monroe County, Mississippi, then took to GW’s forum to point out the other problems with the contest.  Under the headline “GW is Running a Numbers Game,”  Terry noted that the contest could  be easily “gamed” and that in any event,

Why not a contest based upon content, character, helpfulness, consistency, and clarity of postings/comments rather than who has piled up the most numbers in any of these categories?

Within hours, GW had revised the contest rules to take up Terry’s suggestion and about the same, Terry’s post had been taken down.

Will people never learn?

Nothing roils the blogosphere or the Twitterverse like the appearance of censorship.

FamilyLink tried to mitigate this disaster by cancelling even the revised contest and by purporting to seek community input on “the level of censorship” at GW.  The now-anonymous FamilyLink poster asked whether GW should allow pornography, commercial advertising and, by the way, disrespectful and rude posts.   This all seemed a red herring.  Nobody in the community wants porn; and there wasn’t any realistic chance that there will be “porn” depsite the difficulty in defining it and the various hypotheticals posed by commenters.  Most don’t want ads (that ultimately will lead to spam), either.

In the mid-afternoon, the FamilyLink poster apologized (perhaps at the prompting of Paul Allen) for removing the post and then asked whether profanity should be allowed on the site.  This led to another “down the rabbit hole” discussion.

The entire episode left folks wondering if FamilyLink understands social networks at all.  As for avoiding such mis-steps and learning to deal with the blogsphere and Twitttereverse, there plenty of precedents:  Ancestry.com, Facebook, etc.

GW’s auspicious start was marred not only by this tawdry business, but by a techno-rookie error in handling its domain name transfer that left the site off-line two nights ago.

I wrote in the forum discussion on this topic at GenealogyWise:

It seems to me that the history of such cyber-communities, brief in time though it may be, is rich with examples of how community sponsors should interact with the community. It is true that these precedents come from trial and error. One consistent theme is that community members believe strongly in the right to express dissatisfaction with the sponsor when they believe it is warranted. The success of any such community depends on recognition of this fact.

I know a number of people that I like and respect that are bailing out of GenealogyWise. for the time being I’m staying. I think it’s too early to make a judgment on this community. But after the last couple of days, GW, remember I’m from Missouri–you’ll have to show me.

Craig

10 Responses to “FamilyLink Mis-Cues Mar GW Debut; “H*ll” Breaks Loose at Site”

  • J. Moore says:

    When I saw Thornton’s post re: the initial contest, I was ambivalent. I could see his points, but wasn’t terribly concerned about the contest myself. However, their censorship of him was beyond lame and v. irritating. Still, like yourself, I’m more “we’ll see” than anything. I do think there’s a niche for them to fill here.

  • [...] and I’m already sporting the bump.  So, what to wear has become more of a concern this year. FamilyLink Mis-Cues Mar GW Debut; “H*ll” Breaks Loose at Site – blog.geneablogie.net 07/18/2009 I had written some fairly positive things about [...]

  • [...] More: FamilyLink Mis-Cues Mar GW Debut; “H*ll” Breaks Loose at Site [...]

  • Thank you for posting this. The blogging world can always count on you for a well-reasoned, well-thought out and most importantly, well-written assessment of a situation. I’m at GenealogyWise and will stay for awhile, but right now I don’t spend lots of time there – we’ll see.

  • Martin Freeman says:

    Tamura Jones seems to be one who was on top of it all, twitting and updating her GenWise review.
    She is critical and not impressed yet. Her review also has a great collection of links to other reviews.

  • Thanks Craig for the mention – I think many of us want the best to come out of this situation and really want a social media platform without all the nonsense at Facebook. I am still in the wait and see category and I will be adding some content over the weekend – we will see what next week brings.

    Thomas MacEntee
    GeneaBloggers

  • Craig says:

    Indeed, I see a lot of potential here. I hope they’re listening.

  • Thank you Craig for your insightful summary of my involvement in the GW controversy. You are one of the few writers thus far to cut to the chase especially in all of the implied reasons as to why my work was censored. I guess if you say “rude” and “disrespectful” and “bashing” and “profanity” and “porn” enough times while discussing a post that has been vaporized that everyone will come to the conclusion that Thornton was all of these things and perhaps more.

    Yes, I accepted the CEO’s apology — I think he was sincere. And yes, I accepted the hired hand’s apology for removing my discussion post. I forgive them both but I’ll never forget what they did to me and to the blogging community.

    Terry Thornton
    Fulton, Mississippi

  • Elizabeth says:

    I’ve been busy traveling and tending to visiting family and sick toddler, thus missing all the excitement at GW. I really don’t need more drama in my life. Is it worth checking out? Or should I pass?

  • [...] a somewhat bumpy launch in the summer of 2009, this extremely active community has grown exponentially, and as of today [...]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

July 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Recent Comments

Archives