Tag Archive for Census Records

Census Sometimes Little Help Tracking Migrations

I put my census form in the mail a little after the first of the month. I also scanned it, and I’m making some family group sheets to go with photographs.  All these items together will constitute our family’s census 2010 documentation.

Seventy-two years from now, family researchers may conclude that I have lived in the same county for an uninterrupted thirty years or more.  I was here on Census Day 1980, Census Day 1990, Census Day 2000, and Census Day 2010.  Of the six censuses on which I should appear including the present, four of them show me living in Sacramento County.  In fact, during that 30 year period of time, I have lived in Prince George’s County, Maryland; Pima County, Arizona; Suffolk and Norfolk counties in England; El Paso County, Colorado; Alexandria city, Virginia (twice); and Fairfax County, Virginia (basically in that order).  But somehow, I always manage to be back in Sacramento County at census time.

At the time of the 1970 census, I lived in Monterey County, California.   Before the 1970 census, I had spent more than half my life to that point, living in Bernalillo County, New Mexico.  At the time of the 1960 census, I actually lived in Karlsruhe, Baden-Wuerttemburg, Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Federal Republic of Germany, then popularly known as "West Germany"], very near the French border.

So in 1960, my family was among the 1,374,422 Americans living abroad. (Oops, make that 1,374,421 –Elvis had left the Bundesrepublik on March 1 before Census Day).  These consisted not only of military personnel and their dependents living with them, but included federal civilian employees stationed abroad and their dependents living with them; crews of vessels of the US merchant Marine at sea or docked at a foreign port; and private US citizens living abroad for an extended period and their dependents living with them.   In 1960, none of these people were enumerated stateside, and hence were not included in the apportionment of Congress.  (See Mills, Karen M., Americans Overseas in US Censuses, Technical Paper #62, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1993, available at http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/overseas/techn62-1.pdf ).
My dad, an Army first lieutenant at the time, received a form like the one below, and filled it out.  He returned the form through his chain of command, and it, like all such forms, was eventually shipped to the Census Operations Center at Jeffersonville, Indiana.
1960 military census form

1960 military census form (back)

Census form used by military personnel overseas in 1960 (front and back)

One result of the 1960 census for my family was that the government had two different domiciles for us: the Census Bureau said we were domiciled “overseas,” and the Army said we were residents of Harris County, Texas, a place I had only visited for less than a week in my entire life to that point. What a country!

The rule about where to count Americans overseas, i.e., as part of their “home state” population or some “Americans abroad” population, has been different from time to time.  Starting in 1990, the rule was to count them as part of their home state population, which of course has an effect on congressional apportionment.  In 2010, the pre-1990 rule will be back in effect: Americans abroad will not be counted as part of their home states populations.

At the time of the 1950 census, my dad was a high school senior, and a census enumerator.  And I, well, I simply was non-existent.

No census shows me at the place of my birth or reflects the time I spent living in Marion County, Indiana.

Where were you during the censuses of the last fifty years?  How well does the census document where you’ve been?

Census Collection Free on Footnote.com through April

This note came from Justin Schroepfer, marketing director at Footnote.com:

I wanted to update you that we have decided to extend our Interactive Census Collection free to the public through the end of April.  Since opening this collection a few weeks ago, we have received a very positive response.  In order to view the images from the collection, visitors only need to register for free.

Go to www.footnote.com/census/.

Footnote.com has the “interactive” census images; that is, users may annotate or comment the census iamges. The 1860 and the 1930 censuses are 100% complete, while others are in various stages of completion on Footnote.

I found the notorious outlaw Bonnie Parker on the 1930 census, living under another name.  If you want to know where and by what name she was then known, go to Footnote.com find my annotation on the 1930 census.

The New Decade Arrives

So it seems it was just October and here it is January 2010!   Last year I didn’t really set particular goals for genealogy in 2009, yet I came up with a major breakthrough–finding the parents of  my great-grandfather, Richard William Gines (a meeting some cousins on that journey).  So what will happeb in 2010?  I’ve got no idea, but bring it on!

Pat Lust and Noe Udont, the two lawyers in our bits on certification, have at least one more appearance to make and they may be back for other things later.

I have two events at which I am a speaker;  the California Genealogical Society’s African-American History Month event in  Oakland on February 20, and the African-American Family History Seminar at the Sacramento Regional Family History Center in Arden-Arcade on  March 13.  More about these events later.

We’ll be revisiting a topic from a couple of years ago, regarding the accessibility of vital records.   And we have some Census 2010 information as well!  Stay with us!

Halloween Census Whacking

With the crisis of my father’s recent illness and the minor drama of my own, I feel like I’ve been way out of touch the last two weeks.  It’s time get back into the flow of things.   I thought  little census whacking for Halloween would ease my way back into writing.  So I went hunting for Vampires, Zombies, Ghosts, Ghouls, Goblins, Witches and Pumpkins.

Vampires

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the incidence of Vampires is extremely low in the United States.  In 1880,  four Vampires: Otto; Jean; Julianne; and Mary, all in their twenties, were living in Cheyenne,  Wyoming.  They claimed to be actors. In 1870,  there was just one Vampire in the United States, 26 year-old machinist George Vampire.  Of course he lived in New York City.   What happened to these five Vampires  in the 20th century?  Were they forced to leave or did they on their own just pull out up stakes and leave?

According to the World Names Profiler (WNP), Germany and the United States have the greatest incidence of Vampires in the world.  Germany’s statistic is 0.04 per million, while in the U.S., the figure is 0.01 Vampires per million people.  Regionally, the American Vampires are located in Oklahoma, according to the WNP.  The Sooner state has a Vampire index of 1.04 per million.  With a 2008 estimated population of 3,640,000 or so,  there would be about four Vampires in Oklahoma.   I found in public records three listings in Lawton, Oklahoma, for Madonna Vampire.  Unfortunately for her, there are at least thirty people named Buffy in Oklahoma presently.

Zombies

Nearly all the Zombies in the census records turned out to be mis-transcriptions of other names.  The WNP reports no Zombies in the United States.  Public records reviews show about 14 Zombies in various places around the country.

Ghosts

Kraft Ghost of Fayette County, Pennsylvania, and Leonard Ghost of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, both listed on the 1790 federal census appear to be the first two Ghosts in America.  But in the 1900 census, the number of Ghosts expands exponentially.  Most of these “new” Ghosts are Native Americans in the upper Midwest.  The WNP indicates a Ghost index of 18.29 per million in South Dakota and 3.37 per million in Nebraska.  South Dakota’s estimated 2008 population was 804,000, which would yield about 15 Ghosts. Public records reveal about 17 Ghosts in South Dakota (when obvious duplicates are eliminated).

Nebraska’s estimated population is about 1.8 million, suggesting something a bit more than six Ghosts.  I was able to find only one Ghost in Nebraska in public records. The rest seem to have vanished.

And how about Pennsylvania where it seems to have begun for Ghosts in America?   WNP’s Pennsylvania Ghost index is 2.58 per million.   That would mean about 32 Ghosts presently among Pennsylvania’s estimated 12.45 million folks.  I was able to identify 25 Ghosts in Pennsylvania public records after eliminating duplicates and two entries which appeared to refer to religious organizations.

Ghouls

Apparently, the first Ghoul in America was 66 year-old Christian Ghoul of Maryland, a German immigrant.  He appears on the 1870 census.  Few other Ghouls seem to have been counted until the 1900 census, where like the Ghosts, the Ghouls grew rapidly in number.  And like the Ghosts, most of the “new” Ghouls were Indians, living primarily in Tehama County, California.

When it comes to Ghouls, the United States doesn’t even register in the WNP top ten. (Number one is France, with a Ghoul incidence of 4.59 per million; Switzerland is a distant second at 1.92 per million, supporting evidence that the Gauls may be the most Ghoulish people on Earth). (Hey, I just report the facts!)

Within in the U.S., however, Ghouls seem to be concentrated around Las Vegas and Chicago, at least according to the WNP.  Clark County, Nevada, which includes Las Vegas, and Will County, Illinois, adjacent to Chicago, were the only two counties in which the WNP found any Ghouls at all. Curiously, public records show no Ghouls in Nevada and six in the Chicago area.  Overall, public records indicate something more than 100 Ghouls in America presently, with perhaps as many as 10% of those in California.   This is the biggest disparity I’ve ever seen between WNP data and public records. [The WNP's FAQs state: "All our names and location data are derived from publicly available telephone directories or national electoral registers, sourced for the period 2000-2005."]

Goblins

A man named Goblin was first in recorded in New York City in the 1850 census.  In 1860 there was still just one Goblin on the census and that was 14-year-old Lucinda Goblin who lived with the Davenport household in Columbia, Missouri.  But just 10 years later, the 1870 census showed that three fourths of the (four) Goblins in the USA lived in North Carolina.  By 1900 however, the number of Goblins in America had increased nearly eight-fold to a total of 33, to be found in every region of the country.

Globally, the number of Goblins in the U.S. doesn’t make the slightest statistical ripple, using WNP data.  Number one is France, again, with  0.2 Goblins per million.  The United Kingdom is far, far, behind with 0.02 per million.

Witches

We all know the history of Witch hunts in America. Surprisingly enough however only one Witch appears on the 1790 census and that would be Peter Witch of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania (just what is it with Pennsylvania and Lancaster in particular?).  There was also a Witch in Rutledge County, Alabama, in 1790.  By 1900, Witches were routinely enumerated in the census all over the country.  Sadly, two of them were little boys: Jacob Witch, 10 years old, and his brother, Henry Witch five years old, who were apparently in an orphanage in Las Galinas, Marin County, California.

Turns out that there are far more Witches in the U.K. and Canada than in the USA (the only countries reporting any Witches at all).  The British Witch population (0.5 per million) is concentrated in Newport (Casnewydd), Wales, and the southwest jurisdictions of North Somerset, Bath and Northeast Somerset, as well as the City of Bristol.  There are also a few Witches in Surrey.

According to WNP, Manitoba’s  Witch frequency of 2.93 per million accounts for the whole of Canada’s 0.23 per million Witch index. Manitoba has an estimated population of 1.2 million; all of Canada consists of 31.6 million people. Mathematically, that does not work out.  Unfortunately the WNP provincial map of Manitoba gives no further details.

The U.S. Witch frequency is a comparatively minuscule 0.04 per million.  WNP finds Witches concentrated in Dickinson County, Kansas, and Howard County, Maryland.  A public records search reveals about twelve Witches in  the USA (eliminating commercial enterprises like plumbing and construction ["Ditch Witch"] and fast food restaurants [Fish Witch"]).  None of the Witches were found in Kansas and of the two in Maryland, neither was in Howard County.

Pumpkins

John Pumpkin appears as the only one of his surname on the 1820 census.  He lived in Fayette Count, Kentucky.  Virtually no other Pumpkins are found in the census until 1880.  In that year, Pumpkins were concentrated in two areas of the country: Fresno County, California, and Greene County, Georgia.  The latter jurisdiction included a young lady, 15 years old, named  Etta Pumpkin.  Following a pattern that we’ve seen before, the 1900 census showed a huge increase in the number of Pumpkins in America. Again this had to do with the number of Native Americans enumerated on the census in that year.  The Indian Pumpkins were primarily on reservations in the upper Midwest.  By 1910, however, they were concentrated in Madera County, California, and Cherokee County, Oklahoma.  The Oklahoma Pumpkins included one Mary Pumpkin Gritts.

The WNP data shows the expected distribution of Pumpkins in the USA based on historical data.  South Dakota, Montana, and Oklahoma are leading Pumpkin states, based presumably on the frequency of the name among Indians.

Other “Important” News

While I was whacking away on Halloween themes, I started wondering about some other things. Not only did I find unexpected discrepancies with the usually reliable World Names Profiler, but I also now have reason to question the competence of the Census Bureau, whose data report not a single Fool, Clown, or Jackass has ever been enumerated in Washington, D.C.

BREAKING NEWS: Entire Census Going on Footnote.com

At this hour, Footnote.com is releasing details of its venture with the National Archives to digitize and make a searchable database of the entire set of available U.S. census population schedules from 1780 to 1930.  Footnote.com presently has the complete 1860 census and about 97% of the 1930 census available on its site.  In a press release from its Lindon, Utah, headquarters, Footnote.com says that the entire census collection will be “interactive,”  as its 1930 and 1860 versions are already.   Here’s the entire press release:

Lindon, UT – October 29, 2009 – Today Footnote.com (http://www.footnote.com) announced it will digitize and create a searchable database for all publicly available U.S. Federal Censuses ranging from the first U.S. Census taken in 1790 to the most current public census from 1930.

Through its partnership with The National Archives, Footnote.com will add more than 9.5 million images featuring over a half a billion names to its extensive online record collection.

“The census is the most heavily used body of records from the National Archives,” explains Cynthia Fox, Deputy Director at the National Archives. “In addition to names and ages, they are used to obtain dates for naturalizations and the year of immigration. This information can then be used to locate additional records.”

With over 60 million historical records already online, Footnote.com will use the U.S. Census records to tie content together, creating a pathway to discover additional records that previously have been difficult to find.

“We see the census as a highway leading back to the 18th century,” explains Russ Wilding, CEO of Footnote.com. “This Census Highway provides off-ramps leading to additional records on the site such as naturalization records, historical newspapers, military records and more. Going forward, Footnote.com will continue to add valuable and unique collections that will enhance the census collection.”

To date, Footnote.com has already completed census collections from two key decades: 1930 and 1860. As more census decades are added to the site, visitors to Footnote.com can view the status for each decade and sign up for an email notification when more records are added to the site for a particular year.

View the Census Progress Page on Footnote.com.

In addition to making these records more accessible, Footnote.com is advancing the way people use the census by creating an interactive experience. Footnote Members can enrich the census records by adding their own contributions. For any person found in the census, users can:

  • Add comments and insights about that person
  • Upload and attach scanned photos or documents related to that person
  • Generate a Footnote Page for any individual that features stories, a photo gallery, timeline and map
  • Identify relatives found in the census by clicking the I’m Related button

See the 1930 Interactive Census record for Jimmy Stewart.

“The most popular feature of our Interactive Census is the I’m Related button,” states Roger Bell, Senior Vice President of Product Development at Footnote.com. “This provides an easy way for people to show relations and actually use the census records to make connections with others that may be related to the same person.”

Footnote.com works with the National Archives and other organizations to add at least a million new documents and photos a month to the site. Since launching the site in January 2007, Footnote.com has digitized and added over 60 million original source records to the site, including records pertaining to the Holocaust, American Wars, Historical Newspapers and more.

“We will continue to move aggressively to add records to the site, specifically those that are requested by our members and others that are not otherwise available on the Internet,” said Wilding.

Visit http://www.footnote.com/census/ to see how the census on Footnote.com can truly be an interactive experience.

Footnote.com is a subscription website that features searchable original documents, providing users with an unaltered view of the events, places and people that shaped the American nation and the world. At Footnote.com, all are invited to come share, discuss, and collaborate on their discoveries with friends, family, and colleagues. For more information, visit http://www.footnote.com.

Footnote.com Contact:
Justin Schroepfer
Marketing Director
(801) 494-6517
Justin@footnote.com

GeneaBlogie Commentary: Footnote.com is managing to become a sort of hybrid research/social network site, in the process, no doubt will see its usage grow among several sectors of the relevant market. The site has some of the most desirable features of a resource for scholars as well as a way to have people connect.  This became apparent to me sometime ago and when it came time to make some decisions about where to spend time and money, I chose Footnote.com over World Vital Records.  And no, they haven’t given me any $$ to say that.

John Wesley Bowie was born . . . where??

Sunday Monday Tuesday Afternoon Take on Saturday Night Genealogical Fun: John Wesley Bowie

(Yeah, it took awhile to get this together!)

Randy Seaver at Genea-musings has made a relatively regular item a feature called “Saturday Night Genealogical Fun.” It usually involves some quiz or meme or game and is highly popular with the Facebook genealogy crowd and others. These items are not only fun, but they give family historians and others the opportunity to get into their data or apply their skills. For various reasons, I haven’t been able to participate very often. This weekend, though, things worked out so that I could take up Randy’s challenge. It was entitled “Ahnentafel Roulette,” and here’s how it’s done:

1) How old is your father now, or how old would he be if he had lived? Divide this number by 4 and round the number off to a whole number. This is your “roulette number.”

2) Use your pedigree charts or your family tree genealogy software program to find the person with that number in your ahnentafel. Who is that person? [What's an "ahnentafel"?]

3) Tell us three facts about that person with the “roulette number.”

4) If you do not have a person’s name for your “roulette number” then spin the wheel again – pick your mother, or yourself, a favorite aunt or cousin, or even your children!

Without going through all the math, I’ll tell you that my roulette number came out as 20. I used my primary database which is currently in RootsMagic 3 (I have version 4, but haven’t put this primary database there yet).

In RootsMagic 3, the ahnentafel can be created by following this pathway: Reports>Lists>Ahnentafel. With me as the root subject, No. 20 is John Wesley Bowie (1845?-1926?).

John Wesley Bowie would be my great-great-grandfather and my genealogical connection to James Bowie, free man of color, in Louisiana. Three facts about him:

1. He was married to Amanda McCray (1848-1924).

2. He lived in Longview, Texas.

3. He and “Mandy” had thirteen children, one of whom, Elias Bowie, Sr., was my grandmother’s father.

So is that all there is to this little exercise? No. Recall I said these things give researchers a reason to get into their data a little bit? Well, in this case, that proved to be a very valuable opportunity.

I discovered in my data discrepancies about where John Wesley Bowie had been born. Conventional wisdom, as reflected on the website maintained by my cousin Steven C. Bowie, holds that John Wesley Bowie was born in Catahoula Parish, Louisiana. Catahoula is basically original ancestoral ground for Bowie FMC descendants.

Here’s how John Wes;ey Bowie appears in census records:

1860 census, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana

[in household of Rufus Bouie]

BOUIE, John

5

M M LA

1870 census, Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana

[in household of Julien Berzat] [Berzat's daughter was married to John Wesley's uncle, Albert Bowie]

BOWIE, John

15

M M LA

1880 census, Gregg County, Texas

BOWIE, John Mu

35

Louisiana LA LA

1900 census, Gregg County, Texas

BOWIE, John Wesley B M May 1850 AL AL AL

1910 census, Gregg County, Texas

BOWIE, John M B

70

AL VA VA

1920 census, Gregg County, Texas

BOWIE, John M B

75

NC US AL

So this is strange enough, but then I looked into death certificates. I could not find one for John Wesley Bowie, but I found some for some of his children. The death certificate of John’s son Bob Bowie, who died in 1939, states “father’s birth place” as Arkansas. Ed Bowie’s 1943 death certificate says that his father was born in Arkansas. In 1952, brother Robert [a different person from Bob] died, and Arthur Bowie wrote “unknown” where the certificate asked for father’s birthplace. When Arthur himself died in 1959 in Grayson County, Texas, there was no place on the death certificate form to indicate either parent’s birth place.

Just where was John Wesley Bowie born? I’d still bet on Catahoula! I’ll explain why in the next post.

Reading the Writing on the Brick Wall

Wordle: Names

I had intended to move on today and discuss the plantations that we’ve come across in our long way around the brick wall of my great-grandfather, Richard William Gines.  But I want to share an issue that has hindered our search and is not all that uncommon.    The Wordle graphic above tells the story!

To put the issue into genealogical research terms, watch as we follow my presumed collateral ancestor Rebecca Gines through her lifetime via the census.   She was enumerated each decade in  Tensas Parish, Louisiana.

(click on any image to enlarge)

1870

beck-guines-1870

Ancestry.com transcription:

Beckey Guines

Heritage Quest Transcription:

Beckey Guines

1880

reb-guines-1880

Ancestry.com Transcription:

Rebecca Guions

Heritage Quest Transcription:

Rebecca Guions

1900

beck-gioms-1900-cropped

Ancestry.com Transcription:

Beckie Gions

1910

rebecca-sines-lines-1910

Ancestry.com Transcription:

Rebecca Sines

Alt.: Rebecca Lines

HeritageQuest  Online Transscription:

Rebecca Lines

1920

[No record found]

1930

reb-gines-1930-cropped

Ancestry.com Transcription:

Rebecca Gines

Then at her death in Madison Parish:

rebecca1

Louisiana State Archives Death Index

In addition to the examples above, I found Gines family members indexed as “Genes,” “Gaynes,” and even “Sims.”  So I have not one surname to check, but really about a dozen.

How can it be determined that two spelling are the same name and not just different names?  One clue is the length of time the different spellings persist.  A short time for a spelling differential may suggest a mere mistake in spelling or transcription.  A lengthy period may suggest that there are different names involved.   Then, of course, one should check other records.  So where “Oscar Gines” appears on the census living in Shreveport and “Oscar Gimes” has the same address on his World War I draft card, a reasonable inference may be drawn that they are the same person.

There are myriad permutations of most names when one considers spelling, misspelling, mistranscription, mispronunciation, accents, and the lack of standardized spelling until the 19th or 20th centuries.

One thing that I do is examine the census pages some distance before and after my targeted individual.  I find a lot of related people, sometimes with names spelled differently, by this method.

Thanks to Wordle.net!

Another Approach to Finding African-American Names in the Census

Last year I wrote an article called “Slaves and Slavs in the U.S. Census (and how to tell the difference!).”

You can find the post here: http://geneablogie.blogspot.com/2008/06/research-tip-slaves-and-slavs-in-us.html. It describes how to find African-Americans by name in the census prior to 1870. Since writing that last year, I’ve continued to experiment with the topic and have discovered another way. On Ancestry.com, pick out the option that allows you to search a specific census year. Let’s pick 1860 for example.

Ancestry.com>Home>Search>U.S. Federal Census>1860.

Now leave the name spaces blank, but chose a state or a state and a county. Let’s use for this example Clay County, Missouri. Now in the space that says “Keyword(s)”, type “black.” And that produces a list of 34 names of which 33 are African-Americans. The 34th person is a white person named “Black.” In different states, different terms in the “Keyword(s)” box get different results.

Now let’s try Talbot County, Georgia in 1860. With the word “black” we get nothing; but with the “colored,” we have some hits. Sometimes these terms produce first names and surnames and other times just first names. I recommend trying various terms for any given state and you may turn up a wealth of results. Coming up later: Has this technique crumbled my very highest brickwall?

Sticks And Stones, There’s N—’s Living with the Bones!

The role of the historian is to report things as they were found, not as the historian or the rest of modernity wish they had been. In the last post, we discussed using racial descriptions as names to search for African-Americans. We were successful using “slave,” “colored,” and “Negro” to find records that if combined with othe records could resolve long-standing problems and perhaps crumble some pre-1870 brickwalls.

It occurred to me that if the recordkeepers were using “colored” and “Negro,” whatever would keep them from using “nigger”? [I know that it is fashionable these days not to say that word aloud, but too refer to it euphemistically as "the N-word." However, in context, it is fair and even imperative to use the word itself. In the heading of this post, I thought it would be too shocking, having not laid the premise yet. Those who are offended may go read something else].

Indeed, recordkeepers and census takers did use this slur of slurs as a first name and as a last name for black people (and, inexplicably, for a few whites as well). Thus, for example, in the 1860 census in Clermont County, Ohio, we find “Nigger Dave,” age 90, and “Nigger Jim,” age 80, residing with the Bone family of Williamsburg. The researcher cannot let his or her umbrage get in the way–this is valuable information that’s likely not to be had any other way. We also learn that “Red Nigger Mills” died in Rusk County, Texas, in 1932; and that “Lucy Nigger,” a black woman, resided in Loudon County, Virginia, in 1850.

But the use of such disparagements was not limited to African-Americans. The 1860 census, for example, identifies nearly every male Chinese immigrant in California and Oregon simply as “Chinaman” or “John Chinaman.” (There’s a “Sam” or two thrown in as well).

Now that we live in a more enlightened age, shouldn’t we go through and “correct” these errant and offensive records? My answer is no.

What do you think?

Research Tip: Slaves and Slavs in the U.S. Census (and how to tell the difference!)

“No census taken between 1790 and 1860 contains even one slave’s name.”

Harriet C. Frazier, Runaway and Freed Missouri Slaves and Those Who Helped Them, 1763-1865, (McFarland & Company: 2004), p. 12.

Most genealogists will not find this statement particularly surprising. We all know that, except for a very few free blacks, African-Americans were not enumerated by name in the federal census until 1870. The only problem with this bit of conventional wisdom is that it isn’t true!

In fact, a number of slaves are listed by name in several states in several census years. To find them, put the word “slave” in either the first name or the surname search box in your Favorite Commercial On-line Research Website (you know who I mean!).

Searching “slave” as a first name, and leaving the surname box empty, yields several census results. Of course, there are the 1850 and 1860 Slave schedules, but these don’t list the slaves by name. Then there are the Mortality Schedules for 1850-1880, but again these don’t list the slave’s names . There are names on these schedules, but they are the names of slaveholders (although there are several instances where the names of slaves appear–see for example, the 1860 slave schedule for Oglethorpe County, Georgia, Ancestry.com. 1860 U.S. Federal Census – Slave Schedules [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004. Original data: United States of America, Bureau of the Census. Eighth Census of the United States, 1860. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1860. M653, 1,438 rolls). Where are there names of slaves? Patience, Grasshopper, patience.

In the 1840 census of Nansemond, Virignia, there is a person described as “Demsey of Stallings (slave)”. However, there appear to be at least two “free colored persons” living in this household, so it is not entirely clear that “Demsey of Stallings” really is a slave. I should note that on this census there are several individuals listed thusly “(first name) of _______.” They are all “free colored persons.”

In the 1820 census of St Mary’s County, Maryland, there is a person described as “Slave Backey of Boutte.” Examining the document, it appears that there are three or perhaps four individuals in the household and they all appear to be slaves. Even so, I would understand if someone felt that this example seems a bit ambiguous.

So try this: put the word “slave” in the surname box and leave the first name box empty. Now on the 1840 census, there are a number of persons, mainly in Mobile, Alabama, with the apparent surname “Slave.” But notice how they all have the same middle initial: “A”! So it’s not “Nancy A. Slave;” it’s “Nancy, a slave.” You can tell this by noticing that there are no marks or numerals in the corresponding columns for “free white people” or “free colored people.” The household seems to be enumerated just in the “slaves” columns. Thus there are at least 13 slaves named in the 1840 census of Mobile, Montgomery County, Alabama. And there are several others around the country: “Delilia, a slave,” and “James, a slave” are found in Knox County, Tennessee, while “Shedrick, slave” resides in Loudon County, Virginia. “Franky, a slave, owner unknown,” was counted in Wake County, North Carolina. [Can a person be a slave if their owner is "unknown"?].

The 1860 census has several bondpersons listed in Wilmington, North Carolina, including “A Mute Slave.”

Searching “slave” as a first name and separately as a surname yields a treasure trove of results other than federal census records. There are state census records. And moreover, there are birth, death, and even marriage records for slaves in a number of states. Many of these records name slaves. And they reveal much about the social brutality of slavery. Search for the word “slave” as a surname in the Ancestry.com database “Rockingham County, Virginia Births, 1853-1857,” and you’ll see what I mean.

Searching for the word “slave” as a name also results in quite a few immigration and passenger records for African-Americans prior to 1860. For example, on 12 June 1820, Michel Allain arrived at the Port of New Orleans from Cuba with “his slave, a black man named Louis,” according to Ancestry.com’s New Orleans Passenger Lists, 1820-1945.

Tina Turner’s Great-Grandfather was a Slave, But What’s Slav Got to Do With It?

One thing to be careful about is that “Slave” may in fact be a legitimate surname or at least a transcription of a legitimate surname. It appears that a number of people from the Baltics and other eastern European states were either named or referred to as “Slave.” So you can be sure that Slave Dimitriss who arrived in New York on 21 April 1910 from Southampton was not a former African bondman. But records can be tricky. How can you with great confidence tell a slave from a Slav?

First, look at the geographical area to which the record refers. Slaves tend to be found in the South; Slavs, not so much. Slavs generally are found in northern cities; Slaves, not so much. Then look to the time period. Slaves are generally so referred to prior to 1865; Slavs generally later than that. Look at first names as a clue. If there is a place of birth or race listed in your record, that’s a clear giveaway.

Of course, for every rule, there is the ambiguous case. So for example, what’s up with 18 year-old Ellen L. Slave of Waterbury, Connecticut, enumerated on the 1860 census of New Haven County, Connecticut? Answer: we could take a guess, but we really don’t know without more. Or how about the “Slaves” of Edmonson County, Kentucky on the 1860 census? Well, this is probably just a transcription error.

“Slave” also turns up as a surname from the United Kingdom, especially Ireland and Scotland.

Other Searches

Other non-standard searches to find African-Americans include searching the word “Negro” as a first name or surname or the word “colored” as a first name or surname. These searches yield information that when combined with other information may help identify pre-1870 African-American ancestors. For example, a search on the word “colored” results in over 100 records in Ancestry.com’s St Louis City Death Records.

The Last Word

We’ve seen that it is not true that slaves did not appear by name in the census until 1870. We’ve also learned that a number of records can be accessed by racial description in a name search. That, of course, is because of the way records were kept in a different era. And speaking of racial descriptions in a different era, some of you may be wondering the same thing I was wondering. I’ll get to that in the next post.