Tag Archive for Photographs

A Shades Weekend

If you missed the weekend columns over at Shades of the Departed, you missed some great stuff!

On Saturday, Donna Pointkouski struggled with the issue of not finding any photographs of her great-grandparents and flirted with some ideas about how she might get some–all, of course in Donna’s trademark style, helping us see The Humor of It.

My column on Sunday, Appealing Subjects, considered the not-so-hypothetical situation of getting some old photos from a grandparent only to find that another relation–Uncle Sam–might want them kept secret!   What to do?

These columns are part the Weekend with Shades series that has featured such writers as Jasia, Denise Olson, George Geder, Denise Levenick, Terry Thornton, Rebecca Fenning, and Sheri Fenley.  (Hope I didn’t miss anybody!)

Spend a weekend with Shades!

Who Am I? Another Orphan Postcard

This photo postcard was found in family pictures in St Louis, Missouri.  Living family members do not recognize the man. He may be from St Louis, or possibly from the Southern Illinois region encompassing Randolph, St Clair, Union, Monroe, and Jackson counties.

One clue as to the time frame is on the reverse side.  There around the stampbox are the letters “AZO.” There are up-pointing arrows at the corners of the stampbox.  As we learned from the commenters the last time we had a postcard of this sort, these letters and markings date the paper on which the card is printed to the years 1904-1918.

Managing the Treasure Trove of Photos and Documents

So how have we been doing managing our windfall of photos and documents?  It’s going slowly as one might expect.  We’re stll “triaging.”  Some observations so far:

  • A lot of the photographs had been saved in the worst possible way: glued to scrapbook pages covered with sticky plastic!  These will take some extra work.
  • There is a fair amount of family photography that’s just plain bad! I’m seriously tempted to post the worst here as a warning to all.
  • Not surprisingly, so many photos have unidentified subjects, dates, or locations.  Please, for the sake of your posterity, label your photos.

In the first triage wave, we are working with 24 photo albums with pictures ranging from about 1900 to the 1970′s.   We’ll bring some with us to Scanfest tomorrow.

My Favorite Photograph

This was supposed to have been a post for the 4th Edition of Smile for the Camera at Shades of the Departed, but I missed the deadline. (Somewhere along the line, about three weeks ago, perhaps, I slid behind schedule and have been running to catch up! We’ll see what that means for the Games!). In any event, I decided to go ahead with this post.

My favorite photograph? I don’t know. Certainly this is my most precious photograph. It is the only known surviving photograph of my grandfather, William Edward Gines (1898-1956). He appears to be about in his twenties, which would mean it was taken soon after he migrated to Kansas City, Missouri, from Shreveport, Louisiana, where he was born.

A happy, easy-going man, he worked as a porter at a fancy Kansas City hotel most of his life; the exception being the war years when he worked in a factory. He raised seven children through Depression and war; all but one of them went to college.

It is odd that there should be only one surviving photograph of a twentieth century urban dweller; but so it is, unless somebody I don’t know of has another photo of “Easy Eddie” Gines.

Carnival Carousel: Harvesting & Sharing the Bounty

Through a series of unfortunate circumstances, I’ve been blessed with a bounteous trove of genealogical riches, nearly more than one person can handle. We’ve been slowly and carefully going through boxes of documents and photographs (and at the rate we’re going, we’re likely to spend the next 15 years at this!

For this Carnival, I thought I would give you a glimpse of some of the stuff. You’ll see the challenges and the joys ahead. You can enlarge any image by clicking on it.

First, there is this curious picture below, which I call “Children in Wagon.” I think that there are actually two, maybe even three adults in the picture. I have no idea when or where the photo was taken. I do suspect that it was taken in either Illinois or Missouri. On the back of the original is the handwritten notation “For Francis.” That could refer to a number of family members, none of whom seem to be in the picture. Or it may refer to someone other than a family member. The problem is that the people most likely to know have all passed away.

“Children (?) In Wagon” (Photographer unknown; original in possession of Craig Manson, Carmichael, California)

The photograph on the right I labelled “Young Woman.” Again, we have no idea of the woman’s identity or when the photo was taken. We do have several clues, however. On part of the original which I have covered with the frame here, there is the embossed name and address “Maxwell, 2607 Lawton Ave, St Louis, Mo”. This apparently refers to photographer William C. Maxwell, who had a studio in St Louis from at least 1910 until at least 1915. See Early St. Louis Photographers. I haven’t found any evidence that the business still exists.

The other potential clues about “Young Woman” are that this was actually a post card. I’ve come across several post cards with identifiable family members in them, leading me to believe that this was a popular way in which to send pictures in the early part of the twentieth century. Below is the “Young Woman” post card. You can see what kind of shape the photograph is in by looking at the post card back.


There is an address on the post card. To me, it appears to be:

“Miss B. Mc. Quin
2828 Morgan
St Louis
Mo”

And I’m not sure that it isn’t “McQuin.” There were families named Quin and McQuin in St Louis in the period that Maxwell could have made the portrait. But beyond that, nothing else is known to me about the photo.


The next photograph I call “Surly Woman, Distracted Man.” I have no idea who these people are or when or where the photograph was made. I presume that their clothes are a clue. Notice how the man has his right hand tucked inside his coat. And what does the sign behind the man’s head say? Another challenge for you photo-sleuths!

Finally, I’ve come to realize that a lot of the material may be valuable to researchers looking at other families. So from time to time, I’ll share some things that may be of broad interest. Today, somewhat apropos of a Carnival, here’s a list of couples who were feted on their 50th (or greater!) wedding anniversary in the Archdiocese of St Louis in 2001. See if one of your surnames is there! [Click on pages to enlarge].

Dealing With Thousands of Photographs, etc.–Step 1

We decided as a first step to “sample” one of the boxes. There we found hundreds of photos, a number of documents, vital records (including some for living family members!), and a lot of ephemera. Here’s a partial inventory of stuff in that first box:

  1. Photographs, amounting to several hundred.
  2. Two family tree (descendancy) charts, filled out to the sixth generation (how cool is that?!).
  3. Several funeral programs.
  4. School records.
  5. About a hundred newspaper articles dating from the 1930′s to the 1970′s.
  6. Three Greyhound bus tickets from 1954.
  7. Military records for several individuals.
  8. Three life insurance policies taken out on infants in the 1940′s and 1950′s.
  9. Two family address directories produced for family reunions in the 1970′s.
  10. Several high school diplomas from the 1930′s.

As I said, that’s only some of the stuff. Photos clearly are the dominant matter there. But here’s the deal with the photos in this box: they include portraits from the late 1800′s through about the 1940′s; Kodak snapshots from the 1940′s through the 1970′s; and Polaroids from the 1970′s and ’80′s. The portrait type pictures are great–like some we’ve posted here before. Most, however, are in need of serious rehabilitation. The Kodak snapshots have held up surprisingly well. They are all black & white, and generally show a sense of composition on the part of the photographers. The Polaroids are in better physical shape than one might expect, but frankly, they are just not as nice in most respects as the others. Many of them are contained in small plastic albums from which they are difficult to remove. Some of the pockets contain as many as five pictures. They may not be keepers.

A major problem with the photographs is identification of subject, date, and place. As for the older unidentified pictures, there are few living people who can credibly identify the individuals in them. Isn’t amazing how we fail to label our photos?!

One of the things that struck me was a photocopy (and a bad one, too) of two portraits probably taken in the early 1900′s. Somebody, I hope, has the originals, but who?

I think the next thing to do is go through all the boxes and segregate the photos, the documents, and the ephemera into separate temporary storage. This will take some discipline to do efficiently, because of the “Hey-look-at-this!” factor.

I’ve also begun a list of family members likely able to identify the photographs. We did identify a few today, though that was not our main purpose. By the way, I think it useful when labelling these to include a line that says: “ID’d by (name), (relationship), on (date).”

How Do I Deal With Thousands of Photos?

My inclination is to dive right in like a kid at Christmas! But this isn’t practical for several reasons:

  1. I’m not sure how or where these were previously stored, and thus I don’t know the age or condition of most of them.
  2. I probably cannot identify many of then without family help.
  3. I still must eat and sleep.

Given those issues, I have to figure out some temporary storage and cataloging system.

More Pictures . . .

of boxes of pictures (and documents)!



ScanFest: Tell Me About It!

July’s ScanFest is tomorrow, but I can’t make it–ironically because I’ve got too many photos! I mentioned a little while ago that I was anticipating receiving a number of photos from a relative in the Midwest. By Friday, 25 July, a total of nine medium-sized moving boxes of photos and documents had arrived by mail! Today, a 5′x7′x8′ crate was off-loaded from a flatbed truck–the crate contains, along with antique furniture, more than 200 cubic feet of photographs and documents, some dating well back into the 19th century.

I’m not joking.

We have received probably more than 5,000 photographs, not to mention documents and vital records.

I could spend the next ten years dealing with this stuff . . . .

Above and below: Some of the smaller boxes that arrived by mail last week.

Below: One of the hundreds of albums that came by mail last week.

Below: Some of the antique furniture that arrived by freight today.


Below: The crew begins unloading.

Thanks to Faith Archuleta and her crew from Faith Full Movers, Citrus Heights, California, for their help today!

Back From . . . .

Well, I return and find . . . . my mailbox is full of Facebook “Friend” requests! That’s kinda nice! Thanks, y’all!

And I also found in the snail mail two boxes of photos from a relative in the Midwest–six more are coming! I can’t wait. There’s a lot to tell this weekend on GeneaBlogie . . . so stay tuned!