Tag Archive for Resources

Reference Review: African-American Genealogy at a Glance

Just the other morning, a young protege was saying that her research seemed unfocused and that she thought she needed to go someplace other than her usual research venues. I talked a few ideas with her. Then, the next day, I received a review copy of Genealogy at a Glance: African American Genealogy Research. My protege’s dilemma was solved (almost)!

A 2011 addition to Genealogical Publishing Company‘s series, Genealogy at a Glance, this four page reference is by Michael Hait, one of the points of light in the sometimes foggy world of genealogical research. (Wait, did you say four pages? Yes, yes I did say “four pages!”).

Okay, so I was skeptical, too, that such a topic could be adequately and accurately reduced to just four pages of text. But as I studied it, I found it to be concise, easy to understand, yet accurate and comprehensive. Hait covers the field very nearly completely in the space allotted. From “Basic Research Sources” to “Free African Americans in the North and South” the author gives tips and reference citations. He tells where to find the records (many have limited availability).

This reference is useful for novice and experienced researchers alike. It certainly is a road map of sorts for the newcomer; for the old hand, it may jog a memory or inspire a new approach. For all experience classes, it can provide an organizing template for research.

The material really is usable “at a glance.” Hait’s writing is direct and active; the editorial lay out is easy to follow. At the end, he includes a short list of online resources and a “Further Reading” section.

A concession to space, no doubt, was the omission of special collections at academic research institutions such as the Louisiana State University Libraries or the University of Virginia, which house many files of slave-owning families.

But nonetheless, Michael Hait, who writes the African-American Genealogy Examiner column, scores again with this simple, but elegant reference guide. Check out Michael’s own websites at haitfamilyresearch.com and Planting the Seeds.

Genealogical Publishing Company is the world’s leading publisher of genealogical books and CD’s, with over 2000 titles in its catalog.

Research Note: The SSDI (Part II)

This article is about the Social Security Death Index, not Social Security Disability Insurance.

In our last post we learned a few things about the Social Security Death Index. First we found out that the government doesn’t use the term SSDI; this term is used by nongovernmental concerns to describe the product that they derive from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File. These nongovernmental entities receive the DMF from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), a bureau within the Department of Commerce. Individuals may purchase the DMF directly from NTIS in a variety of forms. And here’s a handy link to understanding the architecture of the DMF, if you are technically inclined to explore the infrastructure of the product.  You can use the information to construct your own custom queries of the DMF.

We also discovered that 90% of the information in the DMF, and thus in the SSDI, comes from “first party” reports; that is, from private individuals (usually family members or potential beneficiaries), funeral homes, nursing facilities, etc. The Social Security Administration adds these reports immediately into the DMF. The DMF has coding that indicates verification or proof of death. On some versions of the SSDI this comes out something like this: “V = verified (family member contact)” and “P = proved (death certificate observed).”

There is always the issue of accuracy of a product like the SSDI or the DMF. Numerous studies have been done on this issue over the years. The main concern is not that someone who is dead will be left off the SSDI; that happens all the time, usually because of the lack of a report of death. The greater public concern is that someone who is alive will be listed as dead on the DMF. Statistically the occurrences of this error are rare but they are frequent enough and the consequences severe enough to warrant close scrutiny by the SSA. The consequences include termination of Social Security benefits, loss of the ability to get credit, even the loss of a job.

And an even greater consequence of erroneous death reporting is identity theft. That’s because the SSDI or DMF contain personally identifiable information on individuals. That’s not such a big deal if you’re dead, but if your date of birth and Social Security number are published while you are alive, well, you can imagine what might happen.

In early 2009, the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration reported on the sources of DMF errors. See the table below.

Sources of Error in Death Reporting

Source: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General, Sources of Erroneous Death Entries Input into the Death Master File, Audit Report No. A-06-09-29095, 4 Feb 2009

These data should relieve the anxiety of those who are concerned about first party reports. The fact is there simply no incentive to to erroneously report a death to the SSA, and only the worst of motives for doing so deliberately. In fact, one might suggest that in some cases there is a greater incentive not to report a death to the SSA. Doing away with first party reports is not among the solutions to the error problems with the DMF. As the SSA IG observed:

SSA would have to turn away widows or other family members who visit a field office to report a death until it receives “official” notification from the State before initiating or terminating related benefit claims. SSA would also have to stop processing death reports received directly from other non-State sources, such as funeral homes, postal authorities, etc. . . . .

Eliminating first-party reports of death information would delay the processing of claims, increase erroneous payments, and cause public relations problems.

So how does the SSA keep the DMF accurate and up-to-date? One way that’s taken on greater prominence is the use of the Electronic Death Registration system (EDR). The system allows states to report deaths directly to SSA. While states do that presently, EDR enhances the accuracy of the reporting by allowing the states to verify the Social Security number online before the report is sent. The preceding table seems to indicate that EDR reporting is significantly less error-prone than other forms of reporting. The SSA has undertaken other internal steps, including new technology and training, to reduce staff errors in death report inputs.

Another important fact is that subscribers to the DMF who publish the data are contractually obligated to correct and update the data as they get new data from NTIS.

How do you report an unreported death? Call the SSA toll-free at 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778), 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. You need to have the deceased person’s Social Security number when you call.

How do you correct an error in the SSDI? Go to the nearest local field office of the SSA and take proof of the correct information with you. If it is verified by the SSA, the correction will appear as soon as possible in a weekly or quarterly update to the DMF.

Research Note: A Bit of Info about SSDI

A poster on the APG public mailing list recently asserted that she had come across an error in the date of death listed for a person on the SSDI. She questioned how this could happen when the entry was supposedly verified by a family member.  In response another poster said that as far as she knew, the Social Security Administration does not accept death reports from private individuals.

Unfortunately, the second poster’s information that SSA does not accept death reports from private individuals is incorrect.

it is useful to understand what we refer to as the Social Security Death Index is and is not.  For the best understanding of just about anything, an old rule that we baby boomers learned in the 1960s applies: go right to the source and ask the horse!

As a result of a [1980] Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, SSA maintains a record of reported deaths known as the DMF.  The terms of the related consent judgment required that SSA make available to the [public], the SSN, surname, and date of death of deceased numberholders.  As of June 2007, the DMF database contained detailed information on more than 82 million numberholders.  SSA provides DMF data to the Department of Commerce’s National Technical Information Service (NTIS).  NTIS, in turn, sells the DMF data to customers we broadly categorize as follows: (1) Federal, State, and local government customers; (2) industry customers including financial, investigative, credit reporting, and medical research organizations; and (3) public customers, including genealogists, individuals, etc.  Customers can purchase the complete data file for $1,725 and subscribe to monthly electronic updates for another $2,600.  The electronic updates provide subscribers with DMF additions, corrections, and deletions.

[Source:Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General, Quick Response Evaluation:Sources of Erroneous Death Entries Input to the Death Master File, Audit Report Number A-06-09-29095, February 4, 2009 (available at http://www.ssa.gov/oig/ADOBEPDF/A-06-09-29095.pdf)]

The DMF is not available directly from SSA. That which we civilians refer to as the SSDI (Social Security Death Index) is one of the commercially repackaged versions of the DMF that a vendor has obtained from the NTIS.

The DMF contains nearly 89,000,000 records of Social Security recipients who have passed away since 1936. Most of these records date from 1962 to the present.

Each year SSA adds more than 2 million records to the file. The records include both beneficiary and non-beneficiary records and verified and non-verified data. Sources of death data are: family members; funeral homes; States, Federal agencies (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Veteran’s Affairs, etc.), postal authorities, institutions and internal sources from SSA’s payment records. Ninety percent of the file includes reports from family members and funeral homes.

[Source: Ray Wessmiller, Using Audit Software and the Death Master File to Catch Crooks, Newsletter of the Information Systems And Audit Control Association – National Capital Area chapter, September 2002, available at http://tinyurl.com/3jajwhm.

As depicted on the chart below, SSA receives most death reports from funeral homes or friends/relatives of the deceased.  SSA considers such first party death reports to be verified and immediately posts them to the DMF.

Sources of DMF Info[Source: Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General, Benefit Payments in Instances Where the Social Security Administration Removed a Death Entry from the Beneficiary's Record,  Audit Report Number A-06-07-27156, June 19, 2008, available at http://www.ssa.gov/oig/ADOBEPDF/A-06-07-27156.pdf].

So indeed most death reports come from private individuals.  In our next post will talk about how the SSA verifies DMF information and how you can correct errors if you find them in the SSDI.

Book Review: If You Knew Google like She Knows Google . . . .

The Genealogist ‘s Google Toolbox, by Lisa Louise Cooke (2011)

If we were all in junior high school, I doubt that anyone would hang the moniker “Geek Girl” on Lisa Louise Cooke.  She just seems so socially well-adjusted.  But there has to be a little bit of  geek  in anybody who could write such a clear and cogent guide to expert use of Google.

Although titled The Genealogist’s Google Toolbox, just about anyone who uses a computer would find it useful and fascinating.  The book exposes little-known tips about Google and shows how to better utilize some of the well-known aspects of this more-than-a-search engine.  She has a great idea about turning your IGoogle page into a genealogical “dashboard” and discusses the gadgets available with which to do that. The book begins with the basic Google search and goes right through to cover Gmail, Youtube, and Google Earth, among other things.  Novice and expert alike will find something to enjoy about this book.

Lisa also highlights some sources that that can sometimes be overlooked, such as Google Books.  I’ve long been a fan of Google Books as a source of historical background and sometimes specific individual genealogical information.  I was glad to see it included in the book.

Google’s capacities are probably far under-utilized by many genealogists. This book will excite you about Google’s many  services, and perhaps even  help you break down a brick wall, or two.

It’s available from Lulu.com in both electronic form and hard copy. I bought the hard copy book, the first time I’ve ever purchased anything from Lulu.com.  I found the process easy and the shipping was swift.

Book Review: Online State Resources

Online State Resources for Genealogists by Michael Hait (e-book) (2011).

Even novice genealogists know where to find the basic documents needed for research: the census, for example, can be found on several pay services as well as on free sites like HeritageQuest. But everyone also knows that to do a sufficient job of research, one must look high and low and near and far for other resources.  The question that novices sometimes have is, what are these other resources? And more experienced researchers may ask, where do I find these other resources?

Michael Hait provides answers to both of those questions, in his new e-book, Online State Resources for Genealogists. This is a fairly thorough treatment of not only the types of other resources available, but their locations as well.  The title is somewhat less than fully descriptive.  In fact, in addition to state resources, Hait treats a host of nonstate, but publicly owned, resources. There are also some privately owned resources, such as the records of the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington, Del., some state society sites, and Gwendolyn Midlo Hall’s Afro-Louisiana Slav e Database.   And although the title refers to “online” resources, the variety and scope of the resources he highlights will have most readers hankering to go to the brick-and-mortar locations.

Beginning researchers and even some experienced researchers sometimes will overlook the wealth of genealogical resources at State archives and state libraries.  He lays out state-by-state, the online location of state libraries and State archives.  And he also indicates the contents of the online sites.  He includes university libraries, state health departments, a number of local libraries, and County Clerk’s and County registrar’s offices.

I do a lot of research in state archives and local libraries in Texas, Missouri and Georgia in particular.  So, cyber – “ground truthing” this book was fun for me.  Michael mentions some of my favorite places such as the Texas State Library and Archives and the Portal to Texas History.  In Missouri, he describes the Kansas City Public Library ‘s Missouri Valley Special Collections Digital Gallery and the St. Louis County Public Library, also two of my favorite places. (In his next edition, I hope he will tell us about the Jackson County Government site and The Midwest Genealogy Center at the Midcontinent Public Library.).

His book is easy to use because the table of contents is linked to the specific resource that he is examining and the links to the resources are active links themselves.  He’s also given us an index by frequently used record types that indicates by state where they may be found.

This is a must-have reference for genealogists of any level of experience.  It’s well-organized and may serve as a prompt when one gets stuck.  The electronic format with active links is especially convenient for user and author alike because he intends to update the book.

The book is available for purchase at Michael Hait’s web page, http://haitfamilyresearch.com/OnlineStates.aspx

Resources: California Voter Registrations 1900-1968

Ancestry.com has just added California Voter Registrations for the years 1900 to 1968. I tried this out last night.

My great-uncle, Carl Edward Manson (1893-1966), was the first family member to migrate to California from Texas before World War II. I found him and his then-wife Mary on the 1940 voter rolls registered at 5820 Melrose Avenue, Los Angeles. Thereafter, I can follow him as he moved to several other residences over the next 14 years. Although he lived until 1966, Carl is not listed on the voter rolls after 1954.

I can also tell from these records that Carl started off in California as a salesman before the war and then went to work in an aircraft factory after the Pearl Harbor attack. But it seems that after 1944, California (or may just Los Angeles County) stopped listing occupation on voter registration.

I also found my grandfather, Quentin Manson, Carl’s brother, on the L.A. County voter lists from 1946 to 1954. He had moved there after he got out of the Army after the war.

While Grandpa Quentin was always a Democrat, Carl started as a Republican and frequently switched back and forth between the major parties.

This set of records is a great genealogical resource. Note the following:

  • Most records include addresses.
  • Many records include occupation.
  • All records have party affiliation, perhaps giving a glimpse into where your ancestors stood on the issues of the day.
  • The records are for every even year, because the U.S. House of Representatives and the California Assembly are elected every two years.
  • The search feature will mislead you once in awhile; and after 1956, the records are slightly more difficult to use, for some reason.

I give this resource a 90% grade and recommend it highly. Hopefully, Ancestry can work out the minor search issues.

Sharing the Bounty

Over at Family Matters, Denise Olson is sharing a veritable treasure trove of genealogical on-line resources. The links she’s been posting are part of the collection at the Genealogy Research Resources Group at Diigo, a self-described “social annotation” site. I had not used Diigo until now, but it seems simple and a great way to share your discoveries. I’m sharing things that I’ve come across that may be otherwise a bit difficult to find. Check it out! And see the Genealogy Research Support Group that Denise has started at Diigo.

Research Resource: Uncommon Resources

Randy Seaver has posted about a talk by Ann J. Miller concerning lesser-used research resources. I’ve not heard that talk, but I have had some experience with some of these resources. Here I explain where and how to find some of them. Not all are online and some are not available in microform, either. So finding some of these records requires the good old fashioned hard working genealogical research.

Land and property records

These are mostly available on microfilm from the Family History Library. More recent records are available online in many jurisdictions. A good example is the Jackson County, Missouri site. These sites vary in terms of what is available and whether there is a charge. Jackson County, Missouri, provides PDF copies of documents for no charge. On the other hand, Nacogdoches County, Texas, charges a modest fee ($2.00-$3.00) for copies of documents. [its documents are handled online by a commercial concern].

Probate records

These records include wills and guardianship records. The records are mostly available on microfilm from the FHL. Only a few jurisdictions have these records online. An example is Nacogdoches County, Texas. Probate records include information about many folks other than the decedent. You will learn about children, spouses, executors, appraisers, accountants, and lawyers. For example, last year, I wrote to the Milam County Clerk in Cameron, Texas, for the probate files of Reuben Henry Sanford and Martha Sanford. I learned a number of things that I did not know.

In 2005, I went to Thomaston, Georgia, to examine records of Upson County. I looked through original probate records in the chambers of the local probate judge. It was quite interesting. If you live close enough to the jurisdiction in which you are researching or if you have reason to go there, looking through the ancient books adds another lively dimension to your research adventure!

Assessment and tax records

Mostly available on microfilm from FHC. More recent records are available online in many jurisdictions. See for example, Aransas County (Tex.) Assessment District.

Court records, including divorce records

Some are available on microfilm from FHC. More recent records are available online in some jurisdictions. Examples include the Missouri circuit courts and the Los Angeles Superior Court. Online sites vary in terms of what is actually available. Note that California’s legislature is considering a bill to restrict divorce records—seems to have been motivated by a rich guy’s embarrassment about having his financial information available to public in a property settlement. It’s not clear that this controversial bill will pass.

Obituaries

As Randy notes, obituaries can supply information about not just the deceased, but for parents, siblings, and children. There are several commercial site on-line such as obitsarchive.com and newspaperarchives.com. A number of public libraries have obituary indexes, usually in cooperation with a local newspaper. A good example (heck, the best example) is the Corpus Christi Public Libraries site. They will e-mail or snail-mail copies of obituaries from the Corpus Christi newspapers. Not all libraries will do that.

Passport Applications . . .

. . . have a variety of information. But note that passports were generally not required before 1941. Passport applications up to March 1925 can be found at the National Archives and Records Administration and from April 1925 to the present at the State Department. To obtain the passport files of a deceased person, you must file a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This the same provision of law under which you obtain the Social Security applications (SS-5). The State Department has a handy FOIA Letter Generator” that makes this process simple. I’m going to try it and will report back on how long it took, etc. You can also request the passport files of a living person with proof of their consent.

More to come on uncomon resources!

The Earth Shifts on Its Axis; New Planets Discovered

These things didn’t happen in the physical world, but they seem to have happened in the genealogical universe over the past few days. These things have all been reported elsewhere, but let me summarize:

The Earth Shifts on Its Axis

FamilySearch announced its “Records Access Program”:

to increase public access to massive genealogy collections worldwide. For the first time ever, FamilySearch will provide free services to archives and other records custodians who wish to digitize, index, publish, and preserve their collections. The program expands FamiliySearch’s previously announced decision to digitize and provide online access to over 2 million rolls of copyrighted microfilm preserved in the Granite Mountain Records Vault. A key component of the program allows FamilySearch and archives to team with genealogy websites to provide unprecedented access to microfilm in the vault. The combined results ensure a flood of new record indexes and images online at www.FamilySearch.org and affiliated websites.

New Planets Discovered

Within days of my post damning World Vital Records with faint praise, they:

  1. Announced an agreement with FamilySearch (formerly the Genealogical Society of Utah) to provide its content free to more than 4,500 Family History Centers worldwide. The agreement also includes access in the FHCs to FamilyLink.com, a “social genealogical Web site that enables individuals to connect with genealogists from more than 1,600 cities.”
  2. Announced a partnership with the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, Inc., whereby the historic collection of Ellis Island passenger arrival records will now also be freely available to visitors of both wolrdvitalrecords.com and familylink.com. (Full disclosure: I was a board member of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, Inc., from 2002 to 2005).
  3. Announced a partnership with Quintin Publications for access to thousands of genealogical and historical databases.

Then, Footnote.com teamed up with FamilySearch “utilize their combined resources to digitize and make available many large historical collections. The first project will be the three million U.S. Revolutionary War Pension files, which will be published for the first time online in their entirety.” (I subscribe to Footnote.com, but haven’t had a chance to write a product review yet.)

All of these things change the genealogical research universe as we’ve known it. And as far as I can tell right now, it’s a positive change.

Google Public Records?

From Google’s press office:


Google and Four US States Improve Public Access to Government Websites

Mountain View, Calif. – April 30, 2007 – Google Inc. today announced partnerships with the states of Arizona, California, Utah and Virginia to make it easier to search for hard-to-find public information on state government websites.

These partnerships developed as both Google and officials with the four state governments recognized that the public is increasingly turning to search engines like Google to access government services, but that a significant share of the information on state agency websites is not included in its index of information sources on the web. As a result, many online government services can be difficult for the public to find.

This is good news for genealogists and family history researchers. I’ve long advocated for more and easier access to information and we’ve highlighted those government offices that are the most advanced in providing access. Partnering with the folks who re-invented online search is a smart move.

*Full disclosure: My faculty colleague at Pacific McGeorge School of Law, Clark Kelso, is California’s Chief Information Officer and was involved in this deal. I haven’t talked to Clark about this matter.